Neal Sheeran

I’m off to Owego, NY early in the AM for work. Need to coordinate all crappy weather to be somewhere other than O’Hare and Syracuse. I’ll be back on Friday. Here are some utterly random thoughts:

I’m kind of beaked that Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 is going to be Intel-only

Message to all iPhone game developers that implement the stupid option to send my score to Facebook and/or Twitter: Stop it…that’s lame.

I’m a Dodgers fan, but I really detest the Yankees…Go Philly!

I’ll be the first to scoff the MSM for being in the tank for the Obama White House, so let me also say kudos for taking a stand against the administration’s silly cat fight against Fox News.

Who is the marketing genius that came up with the final tag line for those (completely annoying) Most Interesting Man Dos Equis commercials? “I don’t always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.” Could he have qualified his support even more? Is the Most Interesting Man supposed to be Bill Clinton?

My carbon footprint is probably one tenth that of Al Gore’s. Therefore, I feel I am exempt from his nannying lectures.

Having lived in Las Vegas for the last 3+ years, trust me when I say that the Senator Harry Reid that the nation sees and the Senator Reid that is presented to the Nevada public in the form of campaign ads are two different people.

Did you ever notice that nametags worn by the Delta Force commandos masquerading as TSA employees are their first names? Police officers, military members, other professional fields: last names. That guy that sold you a Big Mac yesterday…first name. How fitting.

Filed under: Rants | Link | Comments (0)

Sorry for the site being down yesterday. Something about my hosting company changing registrars and this domain getting left out for some reason. If you can read this, then it is fixed.

Filed under: Misc | Link | Comments (0)

It’s tougher when you’re stupid. And it’s really tough when you whine about it like a little girl. St. Louis Cardinal pitcher Adam Wainwright talking about Matt Holiday’s error in the bottom of the ninth inning with two outs and one run lead that allowed the Dodgers to score two runs, win the game and go up 2-0 in the NLDS.

That ball got lost in 50,000 white towels shaking in front of Matt’s face,” Wainwright said. “It doesn’t really seem fair that an opposing team should be able to allow their fans to shake white towels when there’s a white baseball flying through the air. How about Dodger Blue towels?”

You’re complaining about the fans? Who are waving little towels? It’s not fair? How about a nice cup of suck it? Wainwright — you pitched a nice game, it was a tough loss, but sack up and quit being a crybaby.

P.S. Go Dodgers!

Filed under: Sports | Link | Comments (0)

And the word for September is 9.8%. Isn’t Biden in charge of this?

Thanks to Don Surber

Filed under: Politics | Link | Comments (0)

What a bunch of f@#$ing cowards. From the article:

Anti-G20 protesters rampaged through the city centre of Pittsburgh tonight, smashing up shops and throwing rocks at police, as officers used tear gas and baton-charges in an attempt to bring them under control.

In riots which continued through the middle of the evening rush hour, about 300 protesters were reported to have remained from an initial crowd of 2,000 in Bloomfield, Pittsburgh’s Little Italy.

Frustrated in their attempts to reach the venue where world leaders are meeting, the crowd, many of whom wore face-masks and armed themselves with rocks, broke windows at fast-food restaurants, a BMW dealership and a bank in the area, about a mile from the fenced-off convention centre.

If you anonymous mouthbreathing dipshits think it is so important to protest a meeting that will result in nothing anyway, then sack up and let the world know who you are. I guess you’re afraid Mommy and Daddy may cut off your allowance and then you’d be stuck at home contributing nothing to society rather than rampaging around and subtracting from it.

Filed under: Current Events | Link | Comments (0)

I couldn't take it anymore. Everywhere I look, it's there. Everyone is doing it. I can't swing a dead cat without hearing about it. Was I missing out on the next big thing because it was only being talked about over there?

Twitter

Yes, I scoffed it before (something about a blowtorch). Whatever. I figured I would give it a shot and see. So feel free to make fun of me on Twitter: @nealsheeran.

Regards,
Your friendly neighborhood lemming.

Filed under: Misc | Link | Comments (0)

I’m sure the President wasn’t expecting this level of uproar over his pep talk to the nation’s schoolchildren. Personally, I don’t think the idea of a speech is terrible and it doesn’t necessarily justify the amount of vitrol; although that somewhat depends on the content of the speech.

On the other hand, the Department of Education deserves whatever flack comes their way. One of their suggested activities related to this speech was to “write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.” Ummm…help the President do what exactly? Ask Mommy and Daddy why they are mean for not wanting a public option? Are the angry grown-ups at town hall meetings too much for him? What issue is giving the White House’s crack squad of bright shining lights such a hard time that they need help from kids? I would like to see the grading criteria for this assignment. Actually, maybe not. I would probably get bent.

According to Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the President’s address “will challenge students to work hard, set educational goals, and take responsibility for their learning.” Work hard, set goals—I got it. However, my initial reaction to that last part was this: you know who takes responsibility for childrens’ education? Their parents. Parents are right to be miffed about this. I expect my child to get an education in school (naive, I know), not be a pawn in some political game.

If I’ve done my job as a parent correctly, I’ve probably taught my son to be respectful to his teachers and pay attention to what they have to say. I certainly don’t want to be put in the position of having to counter that when he comes home with an assignment to “support the President” on some issue that I disagree with. Furthermore, if schools are doing their job at all (doubtful sometimes), then children are taught the importance and significance of the Office of the President. When taken in that light, this affair is borderline manipulative.

Granted, the backlash against this episode has resulted in the White House changing the assignment from helping the President to how to achieve goals, but it should never have come to that. And I’m well aware that teachers are fully capable of indoctrinating students towards a certain political slant all by themselves (because I had some), but for the federal government to get in on the act is kind of lame.

So if little Johnny comes home with an assignment to write a letter about why cap-and-trade is good, be a responsible parent and help out with some research.

Filed under: Current Events | Link | Comments (0)

One area I have always found interesting is the standardization of measurements; that locked in a vault somewhere there was some piece of metal—probably some rare alloy in a vacuum or at some specific temperature—that was exactly twelve inches long or weighed precisely one pound, and these were the standard foot and pound by which all others were measured (and for once that phrase would not be a cliche). I also find the fact that the definitions for these measurements have changed over the years as science and technology evolve to higher levels of precision (What?! A yard isn’t a yard anymore?). I stumbled upon an article titled This Kilogram Has a Weight Problem and followed it up with this Wikipedia entry and came away with some interesting facts, in a dorky ‘umm… sounds great, gotta go’ kind of way:

Originally, the kilogram was defined as equal to the mass of one cubic decimeter, or liter, or water. In 1799, this was refined from water at 0° to 4°—the temperature where water reaches its most stable and maximum density.

In 1879, the International Prototype Kilogram was constructed, a cylinder of 90% platinum and 10% iridium. It was ratified as the kilogram in 1889…and remains so to this day. The IPK and six of its siblings reside under bell jars inside a vault that requires three keys and is maintained in an underground facility outside Paris, France by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. The kilogram is the only unit that is still defined by an actual, physical artifact.

Copies of the IPK have been produced and distributed around the world to other nations as their version of the “standard”. The United States owns two of these, named K4 and K20, and they come from a batch of 40 delivered in 1884. The IPK replicas are compared to the original every 50 or so years…and many of the copies have actually gained mass, albeit a near-infinitesimal amount, over the years. Or the original IPK has lost mass, but since it is the standard, it doesn’t lose mass—it is always correct.

Work has been ongoing for many years to redefine the kilogram in terms of fundamental concepts of nature, and not in relation to a physical piece of metal locked in a safe. This new definitions include using the number of carbon-12 atoms, a sphere of silicon, or a new-fangled machine called a watt balance.

The Meter

According to Wikipedia, in 1791 the meter was defined as one ten-milionth of the length of a meridian from the Equator to the North Pole (that happened to pass through Paris). In 1889, the meter was defined much like the IPK—the distance between two marks on a bar made of platinum and iridium, measured at the melting point of ice.

This was refined in 1927 to:

the distance, at 0°C, between the axes of the two central lines marked on the prototype bar of platinum-iridium, this bar being subject to one standard atmosphere of pressure and supported on two cylinders of at least one centimetre diameter, symmetrically placed in the same horizontal plane at a distance of 571 millimetres from each other

Not 570 millimeters. 571. In 1960 the meter definition was changed and became:

equal to 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of the orange-red emission line in the electromagnetic spectrum of the krypton-86 atom in a vacuum.

The current definition of the meter was determined in 1983:

The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1⁄299 792 458 of a second.

The Second

Our current definition of the meter now begs the question; how long is one second? Again, Wikipedia says that the second first became measurable in 1670 with the development of a seconds pendulum for pendulum clocks [geeky sidenote: early proposed definitions of the meter related to the length of this pendulum].

In 1960, the definition of the second became:

the fraction 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical year for 1900 January 0 at 12 hours ephemeris time.

Don’t ask me what ephemeris time is. With the advent of atomic clocks, the definition changed again in 1967:

the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.

This had to be “tweaked” in 1977 due to atomic clocks being affected by altitude and in 1997 it was further clarified to include the following:

This definition refers to a cesium atom at rest at a temperature of 0 K.

And that is how a second is defined today. The interesting thing to me in all of this is that as definitions for these measurements have evolved to become more precise, they have also become more esoteric. I like it that an actual, master kilogram exists somewhere.

What About the Foot and the Pound?

I almost forgot. Is there an extremely precise piece of metal that is exactly the mass of one pound or a foot or a yard long locked away somewhere or are they defined in terms of atoms or light? Ironically enough, since July 1959, US units are defined in terms of the metric system:

1 yard = 0.914 4 meter

1 pound = 0.453 592 37 kilogram

Filed under: Geekery | Link | Comments (0)

As I continue to dust off some of the rust around here, I changed the fonts served up by the stylesheet. Previously, the main typeface used was Lucida Grande and Trebuchet for Mac OS X and Windows users, respectively. For a bit of contrast and because I like old-style figures, I used Georgia for entry headlines as well as the dateline.

A while ago, I got the new Microsoft fonts such as Calibri, Constantia, and Corbel as part of Office 2008. And today I was surfing around and was impressed with a site using a font called Segoe, a new system/branding font introduced with Windows Vista. So now I first serve up Segoe, followed by Corbel for content and I added Constantia for headlines and dates.

body {
    font-family: Segoe, Corbel, "Lucida Grande",
    "Trebuchet MS", Verdana, sans-serif;
    }

h2, #content p.date {
    font-family: Constantia, Georgia, serif;
    }

I did not modify any of the CSS rules for text size (which is declared using ems from a overall base font-size of 62.5% to make the math easier. See this article for more info). I find that Segoe and Corbel are much easier to read and cleaner looking at my default entry text size of 14px. At least on my Mac, Lucida Grande was a bit large and heavy at that size. The sidebar text is a bit small now, but surprisingly readable at 12px.

With the all the body text updated, Georgia was starting to look somewhat out of place. I hadn’t paid much attention to the new Microsoft serif fonts, but when I saw that Constantia had old-style figures, I gave it a shot and I’m impressed with the results.

Those two minor changes are a breath of fresh air, just when I was thinking the site design was getting a bit stale. Speaking of which. another aspect of this blog that is starting to get stale is Movable Type, even after I upgraded to MT 4. I’ve been messing around with Wordpress and have been impressed. More on that in a later post.

Other Tidbits

The next design-related tweak I want to make is come up with a new header image. ITC Conduit is the typeface used and it could use a update as well. I’ve never been quite happy with the letter-spacing either. I’m no Photoshop guru, so we’ll see…

MT 4 also added the ability to add tags to entries. I went back and tagged some entries without knowing that I still had some leftover default template code in my individual archive template that displayed them. I tweaked that bit and will go back and tag the other entries soon. I think I will still assign posts to categories, but I probably need to update my categories list.

As mentioned below, when I dusted this thing off, I noticed I had accumulated almost 12,000 spam comments. I installed an MT plug-in called Blog Janitor with mixed results. Blog Janitor is supposed to turn off comments on entries older than the user specifies (I set 180 days). Why this capability is not inherent in MT is beyond me. Other users have reported that this plug-in doesn’t appear to work with MT 4. Upon installation I had the same results, until I looked closer and saw that comments were disabled on older posts. However, spam comments are still showing up in those entries. Unfortunately, I don’t have any indications to the reader that explicitly state that comments are off. Also, it doesn’t appear that the plug-in allows me to turn comments back on.

If you see anything else screwed up, please leave a comment and let me know. At least I think comments are on for this…

Filed under: Geekery | Web Design | Link | Comments (0)

...A thousand words. Or a few trillion dollars.

(Courtesy of gunzip, via Instapundit)

Filed under: Politics | Link | Comments (0)